Eureka Classis, Part Three
Prepared for Trinity Covenant RCUS, Colorado Springs August 15, 2004 |
|
|
Note: Although these may seem to be 19th
century controversies, yet they are very relevant today, because the Biblical
faith faces two pressures from what may appear to be opposite ends of the
religious world: on the one hand is
the sacerdotal wing, represented by Rome, Mercersburg, New Perspectives, and
the Auburn movements and others; on the other hand is the subjective and
individualizing wing, represented by the independents, charismatics, and
revivalism [the dregs of the movement].
The two wings are not nearly so far apart as they might seem, but are
really flanking movements of the same idea: to replace the objective
revelation of the Bible with man’s autonomy.
Schaff and Nevin are very much alive in the churches today. |
|
|
Schaff and Nevin |
Reformed |
Developed out of mediating German theology. Emphasized progress in thought. Built on Hegel or Schelling.
“Mediating theology” is the attempt to find the truth between
opposites. The opposites are wrong,
and truth lies somewhere in between.
[Boy, is this modern, or what?]
|
Holds to the
confessional idea, especially the Three Forms of Unity. Truth is viewed from the Biblical
standpoint as “Thus Saith the Lord,” which is either believed or not believed |
Lowered the Authority of the Bible and elevated the
authority of the Church and the authority of tradition.
|
Accepted the
Bible as the rule of faith and practice and rejected the authority of
tradition as Romanizing. |
Made the Apostles’ Creed of equal or even higher
authority than the Scriptures. The
Bible “contains” the word of God.
|
Makes ALL
creeds subordinate to the Bible. The
Bible IS the word of God. |
The sacraments are potential in themselves, grace is
present where it is not exclude3d by unbelief. They are saving ordinances. The sacraments convey the God-man life of Christ to the man
from the Church. In them the very
substances of Christ’s life pass to man.
They impart regeneration and grace.
|
The sacraments
are potential only as faith is present.
They do not save, but seal. (HC 65).
Christ is redemption, and the sacraments are the confirmatory channel
thereof. They go together with the
Word and are of like effect. |
Baptism translates us from the kingdom of Satan to the
Kingdom of God. It produces
deliverance from the power of the devil, forgiveness from sin and the gift of
the new life. It implants a germ of
new life within us. It makes infants Christians. [Gerhart’s Catechism].
|
Baptism is the
sign and seal of regeneration, of the covenant into which the child is born
of Christian parents. It does NOT
implant a germ, for the Holy Spirit is not under the law of the organic, and
grace does not grow like a germ in nature; the Spirit is free to act as He
wills. |
The Lord’s Supper conveys the divine-human life of Christ
to us so as to nourish our souls. The
humanity of Christ is present in the divine-human life, but spiritually. The memorial aspect is minimized and the
idea of the communication of life is most prominent. “Broken bread” and “poured out wine” are
left out of the service. It is
especially views as under the aspect of an offering up of a sacrifice to God.
|
The Lord’s
Supper is the sign and seal of spiritual nourishment of believers by the Holy
Spirit. The communicant lifts his
mind from the elements up to Christ in heaven. It is most prominently a memorial of our Lord’s suffering on
the cross and not an offering up of a sacrifice. |
The power of the minister’s office is emphasized since it
flows from Christ, as the fruit of his resurrection and ascension, and the
minister is given the “communication of such great forced.” He is the organ through whom God delivers
the grace of regeneration and salvation.
The ministers are set apart from the people as priests. No one can be certain his sins are
forgiven unless it is officially declared by the ministers as the
representative of God.
|
The ministry
is of divine origin, but the office, not the power, is stressed. There is power with the office only
wherever the Holy Ghost and faith are present, but not otherwise. It is an office the Church, not separate
from the congregation. The prophetic
office is emphasized. No man is
allowed to come as priest between the believer and his Savior. |
Concerning the future life, Mercersburg followers held to
a middle state, which was the echo of Schaff’s early aberration at synod of
1846. Just what they meant is not
certain, says J. I. Good, who was of the Old Reformed School
|
The believer
at death goes immediately to heaven, unto the mansions of light in Christ
Jesus. Salvation is full and
complete. [There are some voices in
the Reformed churches today who deny that the soul goes to heaven at death or
that the eternal state is in heaven.
They teach that the earth is the final home for body and soul. –cwp]. |
In worship, a fixed order was used, a liturgy read. Altar and altar-liturgy is demanded. They used confession and absolution Confirmation and ordination made
semi-sacramental.
|
Used a free
service, only the sacraments, marriages and ordination used special
forms. Had no altar. No confession or absolution No sacramental ideas about confirmation or
ordination. |
Government was aristocratic Presbyterian. Most of the power was in the upper Church
courts. The character and direction
of the services was in the hands of the minister because of the priestly
office and authority. Classical
assessments were morally binding and must be paid before money is given to
other objects in the Church. Seminary was under the control of Synod.
Theology teachers were are separate office from the ministry and were elected
by the Synod.
|
Democratic
Presbyterian, power in the lower courts except for that delegated to the
upper. The minister could not decide
the character of the worship, or change it, this was in the hands of the
consistory and congregation.
Classical assessments are not taxes, the people are at liberty to give
where they please. The seminary had
the General Synod as the court of appeal in controversies. The teachers of theology are not separate
from the ministry. Ordinarily the
professors were elected by the Synod, but the right for each minister to
teach theology was never repealed. |
Adapted by C. W. Powell with
minor changes and additions from the History of the Eureka Classis,
1910-1960, by the Committee on History [D. E. Bosma, Wm. E. Korn, Henry G.
Hieb, published by the Eureka Classis on the occasion of the 50th
Anniversary of the Eureka Classis in 1960.